LevelTen Hit Counter - Free PHP Web Analytics Script
LevelTen dallas web development firm - website design, flash, graphics & marketing
Home Archives Japan FAQts Photos Links Friends
Advertise with us!
Japan Time:
Home :: Archives :: 8th Edition, May 2004
E-mail this page
Print this page
The Japanese in Iraq
Lessons in Integration
by Simon Marshall
 

School children in Ar Rumaytha welcoming the JSDF.

"Japan ends slump; storms back to form."

Or so it might have read in the context of some earnest sports publication eager to wrestle the Monday morning fans from their working hangover. In reality, the headlines were far more prosaic examples of journalism with words like, "JSDF sent to Iraq".

While the English language newspapers ensured wide coverage, the enormity of its historical background seems to have been effortlessly whitewashed. The dispatch of several thousand troops of Japan's Self Defence Force into combat-stricken Iraq represents their first major international operation since Second World War hostilities were ceased. In essence then, Japan has existed for the past 50 or so years in relative multilateral obscurity, shunned by those long enough to harbour grudges for WW2 atrocities but too many generations distant to remember equal inhumanity exacted by their own countries.

And in this equilibrium it has compliantly stayed, steering clear of international resolutions in often embarrassing affronts to national pride. Recently, however, the Japanese, tired now of their "black sheep" status among the international community, took the step of sending a reasonably sized force to Iraq to assist in humanitarian and nation-building efforts. While this could be viewed as yet another example of compliance in the face of American hegemony over the United Nations and overseas conflict resolution, the truth is that a once proud nation has re-sharpened its claws in the political arena and re-joined what is a decidedly important movement to offset U.S. power in security issues.

The disturbing and inhumane crimes realized by Japanese imperial ambitions and enacted by their dutiful subjects in the last Great War, cannot and should not be ignored or erased from the history books. The countless innocent civilians and POW's needlessly executed and cruelly tortured in the Pacific region especially, are voices even now still powerful and relevant that remind us of a need to honour and respect past misdemeanours.

They do not, however, exist as a beacon for continuing mistrust to prevent redemption and re-integration, although sadly this has often been the case in the intervening years. In the same way that past wartime crimes have been repented and forgiven in Europe, the Americas and worldwide, the Japanese likewise have a right to forgiveness leading to their re-inclusion into decisions of global security issues.

The forces in Iraq, principally American and British in number, are hopelessly overstretched in their attempts to restore law and order and a degree of normality to the lives of ordinary Iraqis. While sections of troops from Poland, Spain and other contributing countries have helped to ease the burden, it is clear a much wider international alliance is needed both in terms of sheer numbers and to add legitimacy to the occupation.


Japanese soldiers able to hold their own.

Japan, therefore, as a leading industrialized nation can have a significant role to play, and has rightly been asked to help and responded in groundbreaking manner. These troops, several thousand all told, are being utilised in purely humanitarian missions, aimed at restoring power and water supplies and distributing food and medical aid. There should be no international alarm at seeing Japanese soldiers on assignment on foreign soil, and the ruling LDP party should be applauded for its courage in this matter.

The mood, among ordinary Japanese, has understandably been mixed. Scores of people, this writer questioned were unanimous in their ambiguity. Some echoed sentiments of pride at "Japanese helping exceptionally needy people", while other were unable to see past the risk to soldier's safety. A frequent response being "Maybe many soldiers will die". Regardless, the Japanese government seems stoic in its desire to maintain its country's involvement, often having to fend off accusations of over-compliance with the U.S.

As with the U.K, Japan's legislature has to deal with allegations of being the puppet on President Bush's hand while trying desperately to assert its own national identity. While cynics argue some truth in this point, it is clear that the day-to-day efforts of those soldiers involved are having real and concrete benefits in the lives of the Iraqi population, and any debate on politics shouldn't obscure this fact. Iraqis, by the thousand, will be measurably better off for the introduction of Japanese peacekeeping troops. As well, the relevance of the United Nations and other multilateral bodies will be hugely improved by this manoeuvre.

The future remains suspiciously American-centric, although perhaps with the increasing involvement of nations like Japan this disparity could be lessened. Evidently, both European and Asian nations will have felt relief and gratitude at the re-introduction of Japan into issues of multilateral importance; the continuation of which will be an increasingly necessary counterbalance to American dominance. The extent of this involvement will depend on the makeup of future Japanese governments, but presumably the international community eagerly awaits a strengthening of this new alliance.

 

Comments to date: 8. This is page 1 of 1.

Carl in California   USA 

Posted at 3:49pm on Sunday, November 19th, 2006

Get off your high horses, apologies dont save lives and those who need to hear them are dead. I dont research japanese politics and economic issues in depth, yet even i can that the only substance is around this california occupation analogy. You see, I live in california and I would not be happy if oh say... the Indians, who in a perfect world of "morality" would be in charge after we "apologized" to them "officialy" sometime in the mid ninetys (sorry I dont know much about this subject in depth either), set up permanent air force bases from San Diego to San Francisco. Sorry to use such a totally impossible example but its the best I could do. Some would argue that the United States has the right because we were morally superior and Japan morally inferior. All a thirty year old kid in Japan knows is that its not his soldiers who are protecting him. nationalism is engrained in all of us even if we dont feel it unless in times of stress or collective acheivement

Tides   Location unknown 

Posted at 3:48pm on Sunday, November 19th, 2006

I think that when Earl has been a soldier and helped the ones rhat needed, than he can talk about military work. I'm sorry Earl I've been there and done that. If you dón't have the experience, please STOP. nha, nha ,nha,........just STOP!!! I was there for my county's interests and it wan't war, but REBUILDING an other mens country so it can be a better place tolive in. I did that with all the risk there was in that country, along with one of the best Japanese-Dutch translator I've ever knewn. Please a little bit of respect here. Thank you!

Brone   Location unknown 

Posted at 3:48pm on Sunday, November 19th, 2006

Interesting info

Eelco   Location unknown 

Posted at 3:47pm on Sunday, November 19th, 2006

I think Earl is wrong on a few points. Rebuilding Iraq is not cleaning up the US's mess, it's about helping people in a country destroyed by war. Also, sending troops to Iraq was hardly the path of least resistance. It was a bold move by Koizumi to become active in international military efforts. This may in fact be the beginning of Japan's Self Defense Force taking on a bigger role in the defense of Japan, and clearing a path to the withdrawal of American troops from Japan. Though Japan has a history of war crimes, I can't think of any country that doesn't. Being Dutch, I never heard the Dutch government owning up to the attrocities we committed in, say, Indonesia and South Africa.

David   Location unknown 

Posted at 3:47pm on Sunday, November 19th, 2006

Earl, I agree with most of what you said, and I do want to expand on your Mongolian comment. It is true that the Mongols committed mass murder, but it is also important to note that EVERYONE ELSE back then committed mass murder. This is in no way an excuse for the Mongol atrocities, but they must be seen in the context of their era, when no great empire behaved any better. This is in contrast with Imperial Japan leading up to and during WWII, when most great powers shunned the behavior that would typify Imperial Japan and the Nazi regime (and to a lesser extent the Italian fascists). And whereas the Mongols have been given the shaft by common and vernacular historians, the Japanese have gotten away scott free with their crimes. As an American, I fret at the crimes of my government, and its attempts to cover up the crimes of its current allies as well.

David   Location unknown 

Posted at 3:47pm on Sunday, November 19th, 2006

The main problem with what you wrote was that unlike Germany, and to a lesser extent Italy, Japan has NOT OWNED UP TO ITS ATROCITIES. The Japanese textbooks continue to downplay wrongs and omit atrocities committed by Imperial Japanese troops, including the notorious "maruta" human vivisection organization. How can there be forgiveness when Japan continues to teach its children that their past victims should be thankful for receiving "civilization" from Japanese occupation? How can there be acceptance when Japanese businessmen rent a hotel in the PRC and fill it with Chinese prostitutes to celebrate "Imperial Japan's invasion of China"? If Japan truly wishes there to become a Greater Asian Coprosperity Sphere, their owning up to their crimes is paramount.

Earl Morton   Location unknown 

Posted at 3:46pm on Sunday, November 19th, 2006

Yet somehow, this writer finds a way to imply that by going to Iraq to act as support troops for the Americans, the Japanese are throwing a wrench in the hegemony works. That's interesting logic. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 by anyone's account. So, America unilaterally attacked a nation without provocation. And now Japan is participating in cleaning up America's mess? That somehow shows America that Japan will not be trifled with by his logic. Japan must learn to hold its own against America's demands. If anything should have come from the intervening years after WWII, it should be Japan's right to stop acting like America's vanquished. How would America like to have some permanent Japanese military bases in California? Koizumi is simply taking the path of least resistance. Don't fight America. Do what they say. Swallow the "freedom and democracy means America" marketing. This article is not journalism. It's poorly-worded, childish, reactionary drivel.

Earl Morton   Location unknown 

Posted at 3:46pm on Sunday, November 19th, 2006

Wow... I don't quite know what to say. I guess you're free to print what you like on the Internet. Past "misdemeanors" eh? Interesting choice of words. Sorry about the medical experiments on live civilians.



Your name:

Your location:

Country (flag):

Your comments:

Security check *

 
Featured Profiles of the Day
 
advertisements
spacer
 
spacer
spacer
Vote for Us at Topsites Japan
Sections   Interactive   Webmasters   Information
Home
Archives
Photo Essays
Japan FAQts
Links Directory
  Friends   Advertising
Linking to us
  Who we are
Contact information
Submitting material
Site-map
Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS 2.0 PHP Powered RSS-XML News Feed